Thursday, February 16, 2012

What's going on: Patenting Issues...


In the eyes of numerous people and software engineers, who believe that the patent system is stunting the growth of technology development. Some visualize patent laws, especially, those patents created to protect software development. Some may say that, it’s just another way for development company’s to make money through lawsuits. In an article podcast entitled, “The Tuesday Podcast: The Patent War”, which through out both the short article and podcast they mention that tech companies are only fighting over big dollars. They’re putting large amounts of money toward purchasing patents, and they’re not doing it to bring more creativity and innovation. They’re doing it to protect themselves from potential lawsuits. In San Francisco’s Silicon Valley, there’s a legal battle between numerous companies and patents seem to be the weapon of choice. 

When focusing attention on patents, its always been thought of as a protection for some type of software, innovation, and or tech development. Patenting now seems to be going as far as protecting the human body. It’s not just the human body that being patented, things like living organisms and plants are some of the things being secured under the patent laws of intellectual property. It’s as if the human body has become a new monopoly. In an article podcast entitled, “Deadly Monopolies? Patenting The Human Body,” medical ethicist and author Harriet Washington discusses that it not that the human body is actually being patent. When focusing on the laws of the government, patenting the human body would fall under the affects of the Anti-Slavery Statutes. Washington does state that an individual can patent his or her cells and tissues. Once those cells and tissues are patented they are sold or licensed to corporations, and those corporations exploits’ those patents.

On a more balanced subject when focusing on the scope of patents, it’s trusted that some of the more popular brand-name prescription drugs will be coming off the patent security, and will be going generic. Lipitor, which brought in close to $11 billions in sales this past year, will be one of prescriptions drugs to fall off the patent cliff. Other drugs that will soon follow are Plavix, which is a prescription drug for heart disease. Seroquel is a prescription medication made to treat depression, and Nexium is a prescription drug for digestive problem. The reason behind this situation is that patients often times pay more money for the name brand medication, even when their insurance is covering their expenses. A majority of most patients have no choice; unlike Lipitor not many drugs yet have generic competition. So what is there to do…

Sunday, February 5, 2012

What's Up: Apple vs. Technology


It seems as if, competing in the world of technology through retail isn’t enough for some of the world’s most popular enforcers in tech development. Motorola, Kodak, and Samsung have been fighting against and suing Apple for patent violations. In recent news, Apple has gone from suing Samsung in believing that they have infringed on the Samsung’s Galaxy Tab 10.1 and 10 different other devices that seem to break the laws of infringement, according to sources. Reports show, that Apple is suing Samsung threw an Australian lawsuit, which claims 278 patent infringement violations. But Samsung isn’t only playing the role of the defense; Samsung is also counter suing Apple for infringement on the design, feel, and even the teach screen capability for the iPad.


Motorola has recently filed a new patent infringement lawsuit against Apple, alleging that the latest release of their newest hardware and software violate 6 of Motorola patents. The development of iPhone 4s and the iCloud are the alleged victims to the Apple and Motorola lawsuit. There are two counts of patent infringement on the iPhone 4S and four counts on the iCloud. Motorola had planned to append these charges to the ongoing lawsuit it filed against Apple two years ago; which targeted Apple's App Store and iOS. The new lawsuit comes after the judge in the original suit request that Motorola do so.




Apple believes that the patent Kodak is suing them for maybe rightfully in the hands of Apple’s ownership. Apple had launched an investigation of their own, and believes that they are rightful owner of the invention. On the information gather based on collaboration between both Kodak and Apple in the development of a digital camera. Apple trust that they’re the rightful owner of the ‘218 patent and even potentially many other patents by Kodak.